The Global South vs. The Jewish State

South Africa brought a legal case against Israel, accusing it of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

The case at the ICJ represents a critical juncture where the Global South openly challenges the West's historical narrative and calls for accountability in terms of human rights and adherence to international law.

The support for South Africa's stance reflects a shift in global power dynamics, with the Global South asserting its voice on the international stage.

The growing partnership between China and various African nations, as opposed to the waning influence of traditional Western powers in the region, might indicate a new geopolitical realignment.

Namibia and Bangladesh, among other countries in the Global South, back South Africa's challenge.

Namibia issued a statement critical of Germany's defense of Israel, while Berlin's government denied genocide accusations against Israel, citing commitment to the UN Convention against genocide.

Bangladesh's Foreign Ministry plans to intervene in support of South Africa against Israel's "blatant disregard for and violation of international law."

The US opposed South Africa's case, affecting its credibility among Africans.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that no one, including The Hague, can stop Israel.

Boycott campaigns against American chains like McDonald's in response to Israel's offensive in Gaza occur in some African countries. -

The Algemeiner asserts that despite receiving funding from the US, the PA is allying itself with American adversaries, signaling a complex dynamic in foreign aid and international allegiance.

The Palestinian Authority (PA) rejected Taiwan's independence, aligning with China.

Mahmoud Abbas reaffirmed PA's commitment to one-China principle and China's territorial integrity, including Taiwan.

The PA regularly emphasizes its friendship with China, while Abbas has publicly stated distrust in the US.

There is a contrasting viewpoint on whether the large-scale military response by Israel in Gaza constitutes genocide. While South Africa and supporting countries argue that it fits the definition set forth in the 1948 Genocide Convention, Israel and its allies refute these claims.

The characterization of Israel's military response as "the first live-streamed genocide" by an Irish lawyer on the South African legal team is mentioned by Le Monde, uniquely highlighting the evolving narrative in international law.