What happened?

  • The first seven jurors were selected for Donald Trump’s hush money trial on Tuesday, with the judge issuing a stern warning to Trump against intimidating jurors.

  • Finding an impartial jury has been challenging, as numerous potential jurors have expressed strong opinions about Trump’s guilt, leading to over 50 being dismissed.

  • The jury selection is expected to be prolonged, reflecting the difficulties due to Trump’s high-profile status and the political polarizations influencing the potential jurors.

  • The selected jury is notably diverse, including various professionals from a wide range of backgrounds, adding to the trial’s complexity.

What is Conservative media saying:

  • Some jurors have expressed negative sentiments about Trump, especially in relation to his COVID-19 handling, as observed inside the courtroom. [Fox News]

  • Despite the serious atmosphere of the trial, a considerable portion of the U.S. public remains skeptical of Trump’s criminal involvement in the hush money case. [Fox News, NY Post]

  • Trump has lambasted the trial and the judge as biased and claims the proceedings are politically motivated to benefit the Democrats. [USA Today, Fox News]

  • Trump’s campaign highlighted that he managed to raise $1.5 million on the trial’s first day, signaling strong support from his base. [Fox News]

What is Liberal media saying:

  • Trump’s financial status has reportedly worsened, with his media company’s value plummeting, exacerbating his economic challenges amidst the trial. [Business Insider]

  • The diverse jury for Trump’s trial includes individuals from various walks of life, reflecting the complex societal makeup of New York and the intense public interest in the trial. [Slate, NBC News]

  • The extended jury selection, marked by detailed screenings and social media checks, illustrates the intense scrutiny and the charged atmosphere surrounding this high-profile case. [Time, Guardian, CNN]


    The jury selection process has been unusually theatrical, with would-be jurors openly discussing their views on Trump and America, leading to some humorous and unusual exchanges in court. [The Guardian, CNN]

Sources: